Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Orioles Doubleheader


On Monday September 25, 2012 the Baltimore Orioles played a doubleheader (two games back to back) against the Toronto Blue Jays.  Doubleheaders are rare in baseball and especially this season, as the only other time the Orioles participated in one, was on May 9th.  Doubleheaders present a unique challenge for the broadcast team in the booth during play-by-play and color commentary, especially for the 2nd game.  They have a lot more information that needs to be included in the broadcast as they have the task of reviewing the previous action while keeping the viewers focused on the current game.  I noticed a couple ways that the broadcast team chose to accomplish this feat. 
            For one, they clarified any changes that might have confused a fan who watched the first game.  The broadcast team tried to do this as early as they could.  Some examples would include the play-by-play announcer Gary Thorne addressing the Orioles uniform changes (they switched from white to orange) and giving the reasoning behind the switched.  His response: “just because they can.”  As well as the new umpire behind the plate and how he calls his strike zone. 
During the first inning most of the time was spent going over statistics of the batter’s last game and how he played.  This is unusual because that time is usually spent going over season statistics.  I noticed that information got pushed back to the player’s next at bat.  Additionally, the color commentator’s (Mike Bordick) role was diminished at the beginning of the game, because the play-by-play had to go over more review and spend less time on analysis of that current game.
Something else I noticed was the type of play the color announcer would talk about.  He didn’t attempt to analyze every second of the game.  Sometimes an ordinary first-pitch-fastball doesn’t need to be broken down.  He tried to pick out the significant developments and the more important plays, the ones that stick out in everyone’s mind.  This allows for more in-depth analysis of the game and also helps to make him look like even more of an authority.  His words are rarer, and therefore perceived as more valuable.  Something else important would be the descriptiveness of his analysis, where the more details the better.  One instance that stood out for me occurred after the Baltimore pitcher threw a strike.  Bordick said: “Great pitch by Wei Yin Chen to follow that fastball.  Down and away it looked like it was going to be in the same location as the last pitch, which gives the batter a huge advantage but it had great movement at the end and tailed off just in time.” 
These are two skills I am going to be working on while doing sports broadcasting for the university.  As a play-by-play announcer I will try to get background information and statistics done early so that the focus can be on the current game.  As a color commentator I will work on picking and choosing my analysis so that I can give better more relevant information.

Monday, September 17, 2012

The "Replacement" Refs


It’s Monday morning.   What are football fans talking about?  If their team won it’s who surprised and who’s next.  If they won and have a chance at the playoffs it’s “how many Super bowls can they win in a row?” If they lost it’s the cold silence of a deep frustration and six day depression until the next game.  And whether their favorite team came out on top or got toppled, everyone agrees the replacement refs simply stink!  It must be a great unifier if Steelers and Ravens fans can come together on the issue.  Skip Bayless and Stephen A Smith can finally agree on something (though they’ll find a way to argue about how bad these refs actually are!) 
These great rivals have concurred on a few issues before.  Chiefly being the class action lawsuit filed by former players regarding concussions, and the payroll collusion suit filed by the NFLPA.   In the concussion lawsuit 3,236 former NFL players have filed class action lawsuits alleging the NFL knew the effect of concussions on the brain, but willfully ignored the evidence.  These players are suing for millions in damages.
The collusion lawsuit was filed in May 2012 and alleged that during the uncapped 2010 NFL season the team owners had a secret agreement to set a $123 million salary cap, in violation of labor laws and the NFL’s own collective bargaining agreement.  The ownership can’t even agree on whether they colluded or not.  According to Fox News (1), when asked about the accusations “NFL spokesman Greg Aiello responded with: "There was no collusion. There was no agreement. These claims are totally unfounded."  However NBC Sports (2) writes:

In support of the claims, the NFLPA cites comments from Giants co-owner John Mara (who said the issue “came up several times in [ownership-level] meetings,” that the teams in question “attempted to take advantage of a one-year loophole, and quite frankly, I think they’re lucky they didn’t lose draft picks,” and that the teams knew “full well there would be consequences”)

The NFLPA wants $4 billion in damages from the NFL.  Over 3,000 former players have filed lawsuits alleged gross neglect of their health and safety.  That’s a lot of bad press for the owners.  The NFL ownership is using the replacement referees as a way to distract fans, players and the press from covering and talking about the lawsuits.   They have a found the perfect scapegoat, and a way to save money by not paying the old referees higher salaries.  The replacement officials aren’t bad for business either, as Sunday Night Football’s broadcast achieved their highest ratings in 14 years last week (3).   These replacements (maybe we should started calling them the permanents) are good for business, and they will be here for a long time.




Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The Baltimore Ravens are the Best Team in Football

The 2012 Baltimore Ravens are the best team, from top to bottom, in the NFL this year.  That includes ownership.  Look at what they've accomplished the last four years.  Advancing to the divisional round for three years in a row is the NFL equivalent of finishing in 5th place.  Last year they fell in the AFC championship game, attaining the bronze.  No other football team has been able to accomplish that.  The closest may be the New York Giants, who just recently won the Superbowl, but they spent 3 years rebuilding and missing the playoffs before that.  No team is more a model of consistency than the Baltimore Ravens, and it starts with great leadership.

Steve Bisciotti is a dream NFL owner.  A hometown guy who actually cares about his team winning more than his own greed and fame.  And I'm personally excited to have the team led by a Seagull alumni.  He and Coach John Harbaugh handled the Billy Cundiff situation perfectly.

I'm positive the top executives and the coaching staff would have liked to have seen him gone immediately.  He was coming off a poor year after signing a large contract.  He didn't have a long history with the team like Matt Stover.  He was just a bad memory and the scapegoat of a failed championship run.  Cutting ties with him would have immediately helped sever his connection to the season.  The hope being that his name would stop appearing in the paper, he wouldn't be in any interviews, and most importantly by the time next training camp rolled around he would be a distant memory.  That would have made the fans happy.

But what would it have said to the players?  Both the young and the old guys.  I believe as a leader you want to put pressure on your guys, in fact you have to, but there is a certain psychology involved.  You don't want to go too far.  Cutting him right away says to the young guys that it's do or die.  That if you screw up just once you're done.  Off the team the next day, no paycheck, you're done.  That's too much for a lot of young players to handle.

On the other side how would the veterans see that move?  We all know how temperamental Ed Reed gets.  Would he say good, good riddance, or would he view it as a disloyal act to cut a player for one mistake?

By letting Cundiff come back into camp and compete for his job was the right move because it showed everyone a lot of strong leadership qualities, most especially patience and loyalty.  I think we've seen how the players have responded to that throughout the preseason and into their phenomenal domination of the Cincinnati Bengals on Monday Night Football.